|
Post by Cynthia on Sept 24, 2015 2:37:02 GMT
Answer the following question and respond to two colleagues.
1. What are ways in which you and the experienced teachers in your school might support other teachers' efforts to purposefully and effectively address the varied learning needs of the students they teach?
|
|
|
Post by maryroman on Oct 13, 2015 19:14:51 GMT
Differentiating the process of differentiation dictates that we all go from where we are to further down Quality Instructional Avenue. We do that be encouraging each other where we are at. Small stable steps please. Revamping lessons to meet diverse learning styles is a first step that I think must be taken pre-differentiation. Using up to date materials can be a step. Letting go of our "on the stage" role is hard. Granted, this process, like any other will get easier as time goes on. Let's work on application. Our students could and should have a much greater role in their school as a whole. Telling them they will apply the skill in real life is crazy. THIS IS their real life! Why would we teach them something they won't use for 5-10 years? Making all these good things happen takes TIME. I do know know, nor can I proffer a guess, on where all this time is to come from. Many of us have other jobs and/or families that need attention. How to do it all well?? Life doesn't differentiate much unfortunately.
|
|
don
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by don on Oct 14, 2015 16:54:22 GMT
DonNash- Kudos to our staff as this is one of the few things we have followed through with in my 20 years here. Yes, I like everyone else hopes that if we ignore something it will go away. Most of my 33 years of teaching this has been true. I think we need to as #10 put it we need to examine our own beliefs and goals first. They mention we should establish and share a vision for our students, school etc. When I told them that a few years back we had a class that was at 18% reading and math proficient they were upset with that. I do not think these (for the most part) young people are going to let that happen again. Avoiding overload I think is a valid point as this project has taken my time away from my family and taken away time to work on my classes to a deeper meaning or understanding. They say to start smart and begin small. I am a big believer that our science labs should be longer so I would support more of a block schedule. We do not have to reduce class size here and for the most part there is good cooperation between the resource/ special needs /people and the teachers. Sometimes I do not think they are willing to give any more time then they have for a special needs student and that bothers me.We do not have to do something really sensational every day but some days we sure can. So, we could meet more often and we could discuss things we have tried and worked and things we tried and did not work. Communication could be a lot better here especially between the elementary and the high school.
|
|
|
Post by brenda on Oct 25, 2015 3:57:48 GMT
Answer the following question and respond to two colleagues.
1. What are ways in which you and the experienced teachers in your school might support other teachers' efforts to purposefully and effectively address the varied learning needs of the students they teach? Chapter 10 Quoting the author, "to start smart, first begin small" makes sense to me! The author also stated "it's vital to avoid a feeling of overload among teachers". Later the author writes, "various teachers have differing readiness levels, interests, and learning profiles. They will need to develop the process of differentiation and different timetables, through different routes, and with differing forms of assistance". This being stated by the author, I think the best way for us to begin this is with each teacher setting his/her own beginning goal and assessing the learning needs of his/her students. Then form small groups (possibly K-3 and 4-6 for elementary and similar subject groups for high school) to meet regularly to discuss the varied learning needs and ways to achieve the goal each teacher has set. This would include areas to differentiate and strategies to try. I know that when I read the two chapters on strategies, I had definite thoughts about which ones I would want to implement and the specific subjects or concepts I would use them with. I'm sure every other teacher had a similar experience. Each teacher can choose a strategy he/she feels comfortable with, implement the strategy, and then come back to the group to discuss it. If the teacher wants to tape the lesson(s), that could be an option. It could be helpful to the discussion process. I think implementing the process of differentiation is like implementing any other initiative. A teacher starts small, gets her feet wet, and begins to feel more comfortable. Gradually the teacher gains more knowledge and, above all, more confidence. She then does more and more to make the implementation complete.
|
|
|
Post by brenda on Oct 25, 2015 6:20:41 GMT
DonNash- Kudos to our staff as this is one of the few things we have followed through with in my 20 years here. Yes, I like everyone else hopes that if we ignore something it will go away. Most of my 33 years of teaching this has been true. I think we need to as #10 put it we need to examine our own beliefs and goals first. They mention we should establish and share a vision for our students, school etc. When I told them that a few years back we had a class that was at 18% reading and math proficient they were upset with that. I do not think these (for the most part) young people are going to let that happen again. Avoiding overload I think is a valid point as this project has taken my time away from my family and taken away time to work on my classes to a deeper meaning or understanding. They say to start smart and begin small. I am a big believer that our science labs should be longer so I would support more of a block schedule. We do not have to reduce class size here and for the most part there is good cooperation between the resource/ special needs /people and the teachers. Sometimes I do not think they are willing to give any more time then they have for a special needs student and that bothers me.We do not have to do something really sensational every day but some days we sure can. So, we could meet more often and we could discuss things we have tried and worked and things we tried and did not work. Communication could be a lot better here especially between the elementary and the high school. I also noted that the author wrote "to start smart and begin small." I don't think it will work any other way. I don't quite understand how the block schedule works, but there are more and more schools doing it.
|
|
|
Post by brenda on Oct 25, 2015 6:27:34 GMT
Differentiating the process of differentiation dictates that we all go from where we are to further down Quality Instructional Avenue. We do that be encouraging each other where we are at. Small stable steps please. Revamping lessons to meet diverse learning styles is a first step that I think must be taken pre-differentiation. Using up to date materials can be a step. Letting go of our "on the stage" role is hard. Granted, this process, like any other will get easier as time goes on. Let's work on application. Our students could and should have a much greater role in their school as a whole. Telling them they will apply the skill in real life is crazy. THIS IS their real life! Why would we teach them something they won't use for 5-10 years? Making all these good things happen takes TIME. I do know know, nor can I proffer a guess, on where all this time is to come from. Many of us have other jobs and/or families that need attention. How to do it all well?? Life doesn't differentiate much unfortunately. I'm not surprised by the number of times my colleagues have made a comment about the "T" word when answering questions. It is a definite factor for all of us!
|
|
|
Post by maryroman on Oct 26, 2015 17:56:19 GMT
Doing this ongoing book study has forced us to keep differentiation in the forefront for this semester. I see a lot of assignments come through the library and I can say assignments themselves are getting closer to standards, using more technology, and becoming more applicable. Way to go, guys! I think better lessons has to be our first step. I realize this is easy for me to say, only teaching 1 full time class that CAN NOT be differentiated (very structured reading series). I still see low level busy work, but less and less. Let's just keep on encouraging each other to take it from where we are to the next step. Differentiation is NOT the next step for some...yet, and that is OK.
|
|
|
Post by maryroman on Oct 26, 2015 18:10:24 GMT
Time, time, time..... between a 10 hour day and family and second jobs it is SO hard to find the time. In my library lessons (mini-lesson, actually) I have found a little tweak to bring the lesson from large to small groups is a start. I so empathize with the many many classes so many of you teach...
|
|
markw
New Member
Posts: 34
|
Post by markw on Oct 28, 2015 15:10:14 GMT
The line stated on page 178 pretty much sums it up. "Do not send teachers alone into uncharted territory." That, and leaders who model differentiation exemplify the kind of respectful environment needed in responsive classrooms. To start smart and first begin small makes a lot of sense to me. The idea of developing small support groups that meet regularly to discuss differentiated strategies and review how they worked or were not effective if that were the case need to be discussed among peers without inhibition or being threatened. Small stable steps need to be exercised and adjusting ones lessons to meet diverse learning styles has to be constantly taken into consideration. Lengthening class times for Science labs, P.E. Tournaments, and class projects like for elections are all logistical components that could be included in scheduling when needed. Again, it all comes down to time for class preparation, analysis, and practically making it work together within a designed time frame to make it all come together. Administrative, colleague, and community support all have to be in place, and again that will take time to fully implement. 5-10 years? Really? By that time something else will be in vogue for us in education to get all caught up with.
|
|
markw
New Member
Posts: 34
|
Post by markw on Oct 28, 2015 16:18:15 GMT
Don, I couldn't agree with you more on many of the things you wrote. Overload is certainly a factor in all of this, and at times makes things overwhelming. I see the value of differentiation and certainly even more so after reading the book. It all comes down to time, support for the process, and will the school district be a proponent of it all away across the board from elementary through the secondary? It will be interesting where this all takes education in the next 5-10 years.
|
|
markw
New Member
Posts: 34
|
Post by markw on Oct 28, 2015 16:27:37 GMT
Brenda, You are right on with the "T" Word. All of these wonderful concepts take time to prepare for. When the pay increases in education, and differentiation is stressed more in teacher training in college, along with teacher workloads being reduced differentiation as well as any other innovative approaches being introduced in the future have a much better chance of being successful.
|
|
bruce
New Member
Posts: 26
|
Post by bruce on Nov 1, 2015 18:47:53 GMT
Chapter 10
The author states that this chapter is directed toward department chairs, principals, superintendents, and others in leadership positions so that is what I will respond to. In detail she outlines the responsibilities of school leaders. Text book wise, she is right about each one. In my opinion this chapter is about our leaders making staff development a success. I believe that it deals with all the things she mentions but especially the following (1) more time (include prep time, staff development time, and time to meet with staff members (2) paying staff an adequate amount of money for work after school hours, and (3) results. I will use an example that could be played out in South Dakota schools. Adequate funding of education in South Dakota has not been a priority for years. Over 80% of the districts have opted out (this means - public vote to increase local taxes) just to operate. The author(as superintendent) makes a presentation before the board explaining the differentiated classroom process. She explains that it's not an instructional strategy, a collection of strategies, or a teaching model. It is a way of thinking that challenges how educators typically envision assessment, teaching, learning, classroom roles, use of time, and curriculum. She also states that test scores should improve in a few years but there is no guarantee. There is no grant money available so she feels that we will need about $80,000 to start the first year. With this money another teacher could be hired. This would reduce current teacher work load allowing each teacher an additional preparation period. The rest of the money would be used to provide adequate stipends for out of classroom time for each instructor. This is a five year project so the same amount will need to budgeted for the next four years. A discussion follows. I know what the results of this discussion would be. She may not sleep to well that night. Welcome to life as an administrator in most South Dakota schools. This same example could be played out with any staff development project, not just the differentiated classroom. The end result is not so text book any more. We will then have to start smart, and begin small. Teachers will have to work any staff development into their normal schedule, no stipends will be paid, and we will only use staff development days as allowed by the state. The biggest challenge for administrators is they need to find a way to create the time for teachers to try new methods and pay them an adequate stipend for extra time involved. Our current system needs to change. I failed as an administrator to find a solution. It bothered me to ask teachers to do these things on their own time and with very little compensation. The answer to the question for Chapter 10 is here. School leaders need to some how change the system and provide staff with the time and compensation necessary to effectively implement any type of staff development.
|
|
|
Post by Penny Nash on Nov 17, 2015 20:54:21 GMT
The way in which I and the experienced teachers in my school might support other teachers' efforts to purposefully and effectively address the varied learning needs of the students we teach is by collaboration. For example, working with another teacher/class on a research paper. Mr. Nash teaches about the topic/era in History class and grades the paper on information presented. That same paper is written in English Class as I teach them the format of writing a persuasive essay. the students then are given an English grade for format, grammar and punctuation. We each teach a different part of the same assignment. Also, to meet with teachers occasionally and share new teaching methods that worked.
|
|
steve
New Member
Posts: 30
|
Post by steve on Nov 17, 2015 22:55:38 GMT
Chapter 10
I'd say that most of our differentiation discussion concerned the academic side of the equation - how to deliver our material in increasingly chaotic ways, but I'd suggest that differentiation shouldn't only include the academic but also the behavior. Like others, I'd been getting more frustrated each day with a certain grade due to distractions and behavior problems, but because we are so isolated due to lack of proximity or choice (I tend to eat in my classroom while almost catching up with paperwork) I felt I was alone in my frustrations. The meeting this morning about the behavior let me know that one, I wasn't alone, and two, that there could be options. I'll grant that I felt further frustration because there wasn't an immediate solution, but I suspect the meeting itself helped change my own attitude. The strange consequence is that today's class period was the best I'd had in a long time. Just simple communication worked wonders.
|
|
steve
New Member
Posts: 30
|
Post by steve on Nov 17, 2015 22:59:02 GMT
Chapter 10 The author states that this chapter is directed toward department chairs, principals, superintendents, and others in leadership positions so that is what I will respond to. In detail she outlines the responsibilities of school leaders. Text book wise, she is right about each one. In my opinion this chapter is about our leaders making staff development a success. I believe that it deals with all the things she mentions but especially the following (1) more time (include prep time, staff development time, and time to meet with staff members (2) paying staff an adequate amount of money for work after school hours, and (3) results. I will use an example that could be played out in South Dakota schools. Adequate funding of education in South Dakota has not been a priority for years. Over 80% of the districts have opted out (this means - public vote to increase local taxes) just to operate. The author(as superintendent) makes a presentation before the board explaining the differentiated classroom process. She explains that it's not an instructional strategy, a collection of strategies, or a teaching model. It is a way of thinking that challenges how educators typically envision assessment, teaching, learning, classroom roles, use of time, and curriculum. She also states that test scores should improve in a few years but there is no guarantee. There is no grant money available so she feels that we will need about $80,000 to start the first year. With this money another teacher could be hired. This would reduce current teacher work load allowing each teacher an additional preparation period. The rest of the money would be used to provide adequate stipends for out of classroom time for each instructor. This is a five year project so the same amount will need to budgeted for the next four years. A discussion follows. I know what the results of this discussion would be. She may not sleep to well that night. Welcome to life as an administrator in most South Dakota schools. This same example could be played out with any staff development project, not just the differentiated classroom. The end result is not so text book any more. We will then have to start smart, and begin small. Teachers will have to work any staff development into their normal schedule, no stipends will be paid, and we will only use staff development days as allowed by the state. The biggest challenge for administrators is they need to find a way to create the time for teachers to try new methods and pay them an adequate stipend for extra time involved. Our current system needs to change. I failed as an administrator to find a solution. It bothered me to ask teachers to do these things on their own time and with very little compensation. The answer to the question for Chapter 10 is here. School leaders need to some how change the system and provide staff with the time and compensation necessary to effectively implement any type of staff development. And I'm going to focus on your comment about time to meet with staff members. Now I'm not talking about meeting so leadership can give us the low down but something more like our meeting this morning concerning our difficult grade. In that meeting staff were encouraged to vent our frustrations so that we could talk about some possibilities. So we need not just time to meet, but to actually discuss the different ways to handle situations.
|
|